Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Log in
Toggle navigation
Search Options
Log in
Home
Member Groups
My Groups
All Groups
Directory
Events
Browse
Discussion Posts
Latest Library Entries
Latest Blogs
Participate
Post a Discussion
Add a Blog Entry
Share a File
Help/FAQs
MentorMatch
About MentorMatch
MentorMatch FAQs
Enroll as a Mentor
Enroll as a Mentee
Find a Mentor
Find a Mentee
Health Law (HL)
×
Community Home
Discussion
344
Library
86
Blogs
55
Events
0
Members
603
View Only
Consumer Medical Debt Considerations under AHCA and ACA
By
Lorianne Maria Sainsbury-Wong
posted
Wed June 21,2017 06:37 PM
0
Recommend
Having private or public health insurance does not eliminate consumer medical debt because plan design, provider price variation, and patients who experience transitions in coverage, for example, also impinge on an individual’s ability to timely pay for medical care. In Massachusetts, the Special Commission on Provider Price Variation suggests that residents of the Commonwealth would benefit from improved strategic plans to combat unsustainable healthcare costs, to address price variation among providers, and to resolve existing market dynamics.
See
The Special Commission on Provider Price Variation,
Price Variation Report
(March 15, 2017). Available at:
http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/oversight-agencies/health-policy-commission/ppv-report-final.pdf
. “Market-driven solutions have limited ability to address prices, price variation and the volume shift to higher priced providers.”
Id
. at 327. Regulatory actions could limit healthcare costs and spending, which are otherwise not effectively controlled by market-based solutions alone.
Id
. at 327.
Consumers are also partly to blame, gravitating unnecessarily to teaching hospitals or other high-priced providers rather than relying on the quality of care found at local or rural facilities that may be medically appropriate. In addition, insurance carriers meet the demands of providers with greater bargaining power by offering elevated reimbursement rates and directing insureds to these in-network providers, thereby reinforcing the market clout of certain medical conglomerates.
The “burden of health care spending can have particularly serious consequences for low and middle income residents, leaving little room for other necessities and increasing financial pressure to make ends meet. Among [Massachusetts] residents between 138 and 300 percent of the federal poverty level in 2015, (between roughly $28,000 and $60,000 for a family of three), 15 percent reported that out-of-pocket health care spending was more than 5 percent of their income, 24 percent reported having difficulty paying medical bills, and 21 percent said someone in their family went without needed medical care due to cost in the past 12 months.” The Massachusetts Health Policy Commission,
2016 Annual Health Care Cost Trends Report
(February 2017) at p. 20. Available at:
http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/oversight-agencies/health-policy-commission/publications/2016-cost-trends-report.pdf
.
Systemic procedures to reduce the burden of medical debt must invoke multi-stakeholder interests and cooperation from the public and private sectors, including medical providers, health plans, employers, and consumers. A reasonable common ground for redressing these fundamental challenges must include diverse stakeholders – federal and state governments, the market sector, nonprofit hospitals and other medical providers, and public, private, and individual payors.
Consumer Reports recently examined the relationship between publicly-supported healthcare programs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and personal bankruptcy filings on a national level. The article documents a fifty percent (50%) decline in debtor cases
filed
voluntarily under the U.S.
Bankruptcy
Code
from 2010 through 2016, which coincides with ACA enactment and implementation.
See
Consumer Reports,
How the Affordable Care Act Drove Down Personal Bankruptcy
, (May 2, 2017). Available at:
http://www.consumerreports.org/personal-bankruptcy/how-the-aca-drove-down-personal-bankruptcy/.
Now as Senate GOP members continue redrafting the American Health Care Act (AHCA) -- or a revised legislative version – it is essential once again to consider access to healthcare coverage and medical debt.
Lorianne M. Sainsbury-Wong | MBA Civil Litigation Council Member | MBA Health Law Section Council, Past Chairperson
Health Law Advocates (HLA), One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 | 617-338-5241 |
sainsbury_wong@hla-inc.org
.
************
Note: This article was prepared in my personal capacity. Any opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Massachusetts Bar Association (MBA) or of my employer, Health Law Advocates (HLA), One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 | 617-338-5241 |
sainsbury_wong@hla-inc.org
.
************
#PublicLaw
#HealthLaw
#IndividualRightsandResponsibilities
#AccesstoJustice
#LaborandEmployment
0 comments
67 views
Related Content
Repeal and Replace Considerations under the AHCA: Elevating healthcare access by needy residents and provider reimbursements
Lorianne Maria Sainsbury-Wong
Added Sun June 11,2017
Blog Entry
Does anybody still care about primary care?
David Harlow
Added Sun April 15,2018
Blog Entry
Survival of the Commonwealth’s Rural Hospital System
Lorianne Maria Sainsbury-Wong
Added Fri July 11,2014
Blog Entry
HIPAA Privacy and the Omnibus Rule: Accessing Medical Records
Lorianne Maria Sainsbury-Wong
Added Wed January 20,2016
Blog Entry
Charitable Hospitals: IRS-Imposed Duties & Consumer Protections
Lorianne Maria Sainsbury-Wong
Added Mon January 12,2015
Blog Entry
Permalink
Contact Us
20 West Street
Boston, MA
02111
Phone
+1 617 338 0500
Membership
Join
Benefits
Learn More
Privacy & Terms
About Us
Terms of Use
Copyright My Bar Access. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic